In re: Emory Chiles
| In re: EMORY TAYLOR CHILES |
| 26-1784 |
| June 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 1:18-cr-00007-TSK-MJA-1,1:20-cv-00080-TSK. Mailed to: Emory Taylor Chiles. [1001999931] [26-1784] MP [Entered: 06/18/2026 03:38 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [3]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Emory Taylor Chiles. [1001999928] [26-1784] MP [Entered: 06/18/2026 03:36 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:18-cr-00007-TSK-MJA-1,1:20-cv-00080-TSK. Case manager: MPowers. [1001999871] [26-1784] MP [Entered: 06/18/2026 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Emory Taylor Chiles. [1001999887] [26-1784] MP [Entered: 06/18/2026 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Emory Taylor Chiles. [1001999885] [26-1784] MP [Entered: 06/18/2026 03:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Emory Chiles | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: EMORY TAYLOR CHILES | |
| Represented By: | Emory Taylor Chiles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
