In re: Ben Stewart
| In re: BEN ROBERT STEWART |
| 26-183 |
| June 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for authorization to file successive habeas application (Local Rule 22(d)). Mailed to: Ben Stewart and Alan Wilson. [1001998093] [26-183] TB [Entered: 06/16/2026 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 Case transferred from: United States District Court - Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [1001998090] [26-183] TB [Entered: 06/16/2026 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Ben Robert Stewart. Are PSR & SOR available on district court docket? NA. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? NA. [1001998088] [26-183] TB [Entered: 06/16/2026 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Case manager: TBarton. [1001998002] [26-183] TB [Entered: 06/16/2026 12:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Ben Stewart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: BEN ROBERT STEWART | |
| Represented By: | Ben Robert Stewart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
