Necus Jackson v. State of North Carolina
| NECUS A. JACKSON |
| STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, GUILFORD COUNTY, CITY OF GREENSBORO, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, S. E. O'TOOL, Officer, B. W. MORGAN, Officer, M. S. DAVIS, Officer and JOHN DOES, Officers |
| 26-1942 |
| July 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Redacted version posted for informal opening brief. Reason not available through remote electronic access:personal data identifiers. [1002028612] [26-1942] CH [Entered: 08/04/2026 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 RESTRICTED ACCESS DOCUMENT (court & party access only) filed by Necus A. Jackson. Document Title: Attachment to informal opening brief (IFP Application). Full document restriction required due to: other . [1002025872] [26-1942] CH [Entered: 07/30/2026 05:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Necus A. Jackson. [1002025870] [26-1942] CH [Entered: 07/30/2026 05:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1002019411]. Due: 08/05/2026. [26-1942] CH [Entered: 07/22/2026 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Necus Jackson. [1002019406] Informal Opening Brief due 08/17/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-1942] CH [Entered: 07/22/2026 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:25-cv-00853-DAB-JEP. Case manager: CHalupa. [1002019388] [26-1942] CH [Entered: 07/22/2026 10:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
