In re: John Crandell, III
| In re: JOHN OSBORNE CRANDELL, III |
| 26-1958 |
| July 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $600.00. Receipt Number: A04-79136-442. [1002022212] [26-1958] KS [Entered: 07/27/2026 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 4 Docket correction requested from Mr. John Osborne Crandell, III re: mandamus petition and disclosure form. Correction due: 08/03/2026. [1002021087] [26-1958] KS [Entered: 07/24/2026 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Petition for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00016-TSK-MJA. [1002021085] [26-1958] KS [Entered: 07/24/2026 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Mr. John Osborne Crandell, III. [1002021081] [26-1958] KS [Entered: 07/24/2026 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:21-cv-00016-TSK-MJA. Case manager: KStump. [1002021072] [26-1958] KS [Entered: 07/24/2026 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: John Crandell, III | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: JOHN OSBORNE CRANDELL, III | |
| Represented By: | John Osborne Crandell III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
