Ingrid Aguilar De Gutierrez v. Todd Blanche
| INGRID JACQUELINE AGUILAR DE GUTIERREZ, WILLIAM ALEXANDER GUTIERREZ-GARCIA and E.J.G.A. |
| TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General |
| 26-2014 |
| July 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Linda Y. Cheng for Todd Blanche. [1002025803] [26-2014] Linda Cheng [Entered: 07/30/2026 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: July 30, 2026. [ # 2 ] petition for review. Mailed to: ICE Field Office Director, Baltimore Field Office, 531 Hopkins Plaza, Room 1600, Baltimore, MD 21201. [1002025596] Administrative Record due 09/08/2026. [26-2014] DT [Entered: 07/30/2026 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review Originating case number: A209-796-547,A209-796-550,A209-796-548. [1002025592] [26-2014] DT [Entered: 07/30/2026 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by Ingrid Jacqueline Aguilar De Gutierrez, E.J.G.A. and William Alexander Gutierrez-Garcia .[1002025591] [26-2014] DT [Entered: 07/30/2026 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $600.00. Receipt Number: A04-79185-539. [1002025589] [26-2014] DT [Entered: 07/30/2026 02:35 PM] |
| Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A209-796-547,A209-796-550,A209-796-548. Case manager: DTemu. [1002025586] [26-2014] DT [Entered: 07/30/2026 02:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
