South Carolina State Conference v. Georgetown County
| FOURSIX DEVELOPMENT, LLC, SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, GEORGETOWN COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP and WE DO GOOD WORK, LLC |
| GEORGETOWN COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of South Carolina and GEORGETOWN COUNTY COUNCIL, members in their official capacity |
| 26-2066 |
| August 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Civil Rights Accommodations |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Michael R. Burchstead for Georgetown County and Georgetown County Council. [1002032289] [26-2066] Michael Burchstead [Entered: 08/10/2026 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Benjamin R. Jenkins, IV for Georgetown County and Georgetown County Council. [1002032173] [26-2066] Benjamin Jenkins [Entered: 08/10/2026 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Georgetown County and Georgetown County Council. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1002032150] [26-2066] Benjamin Nicholson [Entered: 08/10/2026 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Benjamin E. Nicholson, V for Georgetown County and Georgetown County Council. [1002032146] [26-2066] Benjamin Nicholson [Entered: 08/10/2026 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case Originating case number: 2:22-cv-04077-BHH.. [1002031042] [26-2066] RS [Entered: 08/07/2026 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:22-cv-04077-BHH. Case manager: RSewell. [1002030726] [26-2066] RS [Entered: 08/07/2026 09:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
