Christopher Hatcher v. County of Hanover, Virginia
| CHRISTOPHER HATCHER, individually on behalf of himself, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JONATHAN D. MCGILL, MATTHEW DODGE, STEVE DILORETO, TIMOTHY W. SUTTON, CHRISTOPHER RYAN PAYNE, BENJAMIN CARROLL, JACOB RICHARDSON and LOWELL LANTZ |
| COUNTY OF HANOVER, VIRGINIA and DAVID R. HINES, Sheriff of the County of Hanover, Virginia |
| 26-2091 |
| August 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00325-MHL. [1002033809] [26-2022, 26-2091] KH [Entered: 08/12/2026 03:40 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 4 ] in 26-2022, 26-2091. Copies to all parties. [1002033790] [26-2022, 26-2091]. [1002033790] KH [Entered: 08/12/2026 03:31 PM]
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT/STIPULATION by Christopher Hatcher to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [4] [1002033501] [26-2022] Zev Antell [Entered: 08/12/2026 11:45 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER filed consolidating case 26-2091 with 26-2022. Cross-appeal appellant: Christopher Hatcher. Copies to all parties. [1002033741] [26-2022, 26-2091] KH [Entered: 08/12/2026 02:58 PM]
|
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00325-MHL. [1002033734] [26-2091] KH [Entered: 08/12/2026 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00325-MHL. Case manager: KHancock. [1002033722] [26-2091] KH [Entered: 08/12/2026 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
