Katie al-Janaby v. Brandon Alexander
| KATIE AL-JANABY, individually, ABDUL AL-JANABY, individually, TINA WILLEY, individually, IKE WILLEY, individually and N.A., by her next friends, Katie and Abdul al-Janaby |
| BRANDON ALEXANDER and SHAE DENNISTON |
| 26-2183 |
| August 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by J. Robert Russell for Brandon Alexander and Shae Denniston. [1002046093] [26-2183] James Russell [Entered: 09/01/2026 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Heather M. Noel for Brandon Alexander and Shae Denniston. [1002045769] [26-2183] Heather Noel [Entered: 09/01/2026 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Martin P. Sheehan for Abdul al-Janaby, Katie al-Janaby, N.A., Ike Willey and Tina Willey. [1002044200] [26-2183] Martin Sheehan [Entered: 08/30/2026 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed.. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1002044082] Opening Brief and Appendix due 10/07/2026. Response Brief due 11/06/2026 [26-2183] AW [Entered: 08/28/2026 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:26-cv-00097-JPB.. [1002044075] [26-2183] AW [Entered: 08/28/2026 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:26-cv-00097-JPB. Case manager: AWalker. [1002044069] [26-2183] AW [Entered: 08/28/2026 04:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
