Julio Barreto, Jr. v. Montgomery County, Maryland
| JULIO BARRETO, JR., HOWARD SACHS, MATTHEW EDWARD MOORE, ALAN DUNCAN, ARTHUR SCOTT THACHER and MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INCORPORATED |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND |
| 26-2473 |
| October 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Julio Barreto, Jr., Alan Duncan, Maryland Shall Issue, Incorporated, Matthew Edward Moore, Dr. Howard Sachs and Arthur Scott Thacher.. [1002077908] [26-2473] Mark Pennak [Entered: 10/19/2026 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Maryland Shall Issue, Incorporated. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1002077906] [26-2473] Mark Pennak [Entered: 10/19/2026 05:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Ritozeh Ayomide Saingbe. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1002076268] Opening Brief and Appendix due 11/25/2026. Response Brief due 12/28/2026. [26-2473] RP [Entered: 10/16/2026 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 8:26-cv-02912-DKC. Mailed to: Ritozeh Ayomide Saingbe. [1002076264] [26-2473] RP [Entered: 10/16/2026 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:26-cv-02912-DKC. Case manager: RPhillips. [1002076243] [26-2473] RP [Entered: 10/16/2026 11:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
