Jose Ramos v. Todd Blanche
| JOSE ANACLETO RAMOS |
| TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General |
| 26-2568 |
| October 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Corrected RESPONSE/ANSWER by Todd Blanche to clerk Order to require response [ # 8 ], Order [ # 8 ], Motion for temporary administrative stay [ # 6 ], Motion for stay pending appeal [ # 6 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1002086683] [26-2568] Rosanne Perry [Entered: 10/30/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 9 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) RESPONSE/ANSWER by Todd Blanche to clerk Order to require response [ # 8 ], Order [ # 8 ], Motion for temporary administrative stay [ # 6 ], Motion for stay pending appeal [ # 6 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1002086597] [26-2568]--[Edited 10/30/2026 by TW, document struck, see ECF 10 for corrected response] Rosanne Perry [Entered: 10/30/2026 03:12 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER filed granting motion for temporary administrative stay [ # 6 ]. Response due: 11/02/2026 by 3:00 pm. Copies to all parties. [1002085457] [26-2568] PB [Entered: 10/29/2026 01:35 PM]
|
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Rosanne M. Perry for Todd Blanche. [1002085357] [26-2568] Rosanne Perry [Entered: 10/29/2026 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Jose Anacleto Ramos for temporary administrative stay, for stay pending appeal. Date of action to be stayed, if applicable:10/29/2026. Date and method of service: 10/29/2026 Courier delivery. [1002085329] [26-2568].--[Edited 10/29/2026 by AB to modify relief] Daniel Conway [Entered: 10/29/2026 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 Amended petition/motion by Jose Anacleto Ramos amending [ # 2 ] petition for review. Document: Amended Petition for Review_Jose.pdf. [1002085310] [26-2568] Daniel Conway [Entered: 10/29/2026 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: 10/28/2026. [ # 2 ] petition for review. [1002085042] Administrative Record due 12/08/2026. [26-2568] PB [Entered: 10/29/2026 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review. Originating case number: A094-756-086. [1002085038] [26-2568] PB [Entered: 10/29/2026 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $600.00. Receipt Number: A04-79740-458. [1002085034] [26-2568] PB [Entered: 10/29/2026 09:04 AM] |
| Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A094-756-086. Case manager: PBallard. [1002085031] [26-2568] PB [Entered: 10/29/2026 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by Jose Anacleto Ramos .[1002085036] [26-2568] PB [Entered: 10/29/2026 09:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jose Ramos v. Todd Blanche | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Rosanne Perry |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSE ANACLETO RAMOS | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Brian Conway |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
