US v. Tonyal Locklear
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| TONYAL LOCKLEAR |
| 26-4261 |
| May 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Docket correction requested from Tonyal Locklear re: motion to extend filing time. Correction due: 07/17/2026. [1002013970] [26-4261] KS [Entered: 07/14/2026 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 11 Docket correction requested from Tonyal Locklear re: transcript order. Correction due: 07/17/2026. [1002013932] [26-4261] KS [Entered: 07/14/2026 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Raymond Tarlton for Tonyal Locklear. [1002013835] [26-4261] Raymond Tarlton [Entered: 07/14/2026 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 9 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Tonyal Locklear.. [1002013829] [26-4261] Raymond Tarlton [Entered: 07/14/2026 10:55 AM] |
Filing 8
ORDER filed granting motion to extend filing time [ # 7 ]. Number of days granted: 6. Appearance form due 07/13/2026 for Raymond Curtis Tarlton. Docketing statement due 07/13/2026. Copies to all parties. [1002012160] [26-4261] TW [Entered: 07/10/2026 01:33 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Tonyal Locklear to extend filing time for docketing statement and other initial forms until July 13, 2026.. Date and method of service: 07/09/2026 ecf. [1002011740] [26-4261] Raymond Tarlton [Entered: 07/09/2026 07:21 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 5 ] Number of days granted: 15. Docketing statement due 07/07/2026. Copies to all parties. [1002001758] [26-4261] RS [Entered: 06/23/2026 11:13 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by Tonyal Locklear to extend filing time for docketing statement and other initial forms until July 6, 2026.. Date and method of service: 06/23/2026 ecf. [1002001270] [26-4261] Raymond Tarlton [Entered: 06/23/2026 07:14 AM] |
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] criminal case. Originating case number: 7:21-cr-00008-FL-1. [1001993015] [26-4261] KS [Entered: 06/08/2026 03:57 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER filed appointing/assigning counsel. Raymond Curtis Tarlton for Tonyal Locklear in 26-4261. Nunc pro Tunc Date: 06/08/2026. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Tonyal Locklear 29435-057, FCI HAZELTON, P.O. Box 5000, Bruceton Mills, WV 26525. [1001992981] [26-4261] MB [Entered: 06/08/2026 03:41 PM]
|
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Lucy Partain Brown for US. [1001981303] [26-4261] Lucy Brown [Entered: 05/19/2026 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 7:21-cr-00008-FL-1. Date notice of appeal filed: 10/24/2025. Case manager: KStump. [1001980324] [26-4261] KS [Entered: 05/18/2026 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Tonyal Locklear | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Lucy Partain Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TONYAL LOCKLEAR | |
| Represented By: | Raymond Curtis Tarlton Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
