US v. Artemus Monroe
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| ARTEMUS MONROE, a/k/a Money |
| 26-4266 |
| May 19, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Lucy Partain Brown for US. [1001981935] [26-4266] Lucy Brown [Entered: 05/20/2026 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 5:23-cr-00188-D-RN-1. Date notice of appeal filed: 05/15/2026. Case manager: MPowers. [1001981580] [26-4266] MP [Entered: 05/19/2026 02:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Artemus Monroe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Caroline L. Webb |
| Represented By: | Casey Lynn Peaden |
| Represented By: | Lucy Partain Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ARTEMUS MONROE, a/k/a Money | |
| Represented By: | David Joseph Saacks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
