David Meyers v. J. Artrip
| DAVID MEYERS |
| WARDEN J. ARTRIP, S. CAUGHRON, WRSP Operations Manager, TINA TOWNSEND, WRSP Health Services Administrator, UNKNOWN BOOTH CONTROL OFFICER, Wallens Ridge State Prison, RHU-D600,, FIVE UNKNOWN INTAKE OFFICERS, Wallens Ridge State Prison,, V.A.D.O.C CENTRAL CLASSIFICATIONS SERVICES MANAGER ALL CCS-STAFF, BLEVIN, WRSP Chief of Security, WRSP - ASSISTANT WARDEN, CAPTAIN BAILEY, WRSP, WRSP-RHU MDT-ICA-MEMBERS, KYLE ROSCH, VADOC Interstate Compact Administrator, A. DAVID ROBINSON, VADOC, CHADWICK DOTSON, VADOC Director and JOSEPH WALTERS, VADOC Director |
| 26-6174 |
| February 3, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to David Meyers re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001934398] [26-6174] KH [Entered: 02/26/2026 11:31 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER filed substituting Joseph Walters for Chadwick Dotson. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001924787] [26-6174] KH [Entered: 02/10/2026 02:29 PM]
|
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ David Meyers ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001920300]. Requested document due 02/18/2026. [26-6174] KH [Entered: 02/03/2026 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:24-cv-00904-EKD-CKM. Case manager: KHancock. [1001920297] [26-6174] KH [Entered: 02/03/2026 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.