Clayton Felton v. Mr. Clark
| CLAYTON LEE FELTON |
| MR. CLARK, SAMs Pod Boss, MRS. SPEARMAN, SAMs Pod Mental Health, MS. CURRY, Counselor/SAMs Pod, SGT. LABOY, Intel Officer agent of Sgt. Lavoy, C. RINER, Certified Nurse Practitioner, P. POYSER, Nurse Practitioner and MRS. WASHINGTON |
| 26-6257 |
| February 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Clayton Lee Felton re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Clayton Felton. [1001960273] [26-6257] CH [Entered: 04/14/2026 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001934153]. Due: 03/12/2026. [26-6257] CH [Entered: 02/26/2026 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Clayton Felton. [1001934144] Informal Opening Brief due 03/23/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-6257] CH [Entered: 02/26/2026 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Clayton Lee Felton ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Clayton Felton. [1001934138]. Requested document due 03/13/2026. [26-6257] CH [Entered: 02/26/2026 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:24-cv-00880-JAG-MRC. Case manager: CHalupa. [1001934131] [26-6257] CH [Entered: 02/26/2026 09:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
