David Meyers v. US
| DAVID MEYERS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MAILROOM EMPLOYEES, Wallens Ridge State Prison, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR DAVID ROSE, Wallens Ridge State Prison, MAIL CLERK J. HAMPTON, Wallens Ridge State Prison, MAIL CLERK K. CHRISENHALL, Wallens Ridge State Prison, INTEL OFFICER MR. RIVERO, Wallens Ridge State Prison, INTEL OFFICER D. HARRIS, Wallens Ridge State Prison, INTEL OFFICER K. MUNCHY, Wallens Ridge State Prison, INTEL OFFICER MR. BOGGS, Wallens Ridge State Prison, INTEL OFFICER MS. MILIAN, Wallens Ridge State Prison, INTEL OFFICER MS. M. HAMILTON, Wallens Ridge State Prison, INTEL OFFICER MR. C. STACY, Wallens Ridge State Prison, INTEL OFFICER MAJOR THOMAS HALL, Wallens Ridge State Prison, INTEL OFFICER WARDEN D. ZOOK, Wallens Ridge State Prison and INTEL OFFICER WARDEN R. WHITT, Wallens Ridge State Prison |
| 26-6292 |
| March 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to David Meyers re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001950678] [26-6292] PB [Entered: 03/27/2026 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ David Meyers ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001938498]. Requested document due 03/20/2026. [26-6292] PB [Entered: 03/05/2026 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:25-cv-00913-EKD-CKM. Case manager: PBallard. [1001938495] [26-6292] PB [Entered: 03/05/2026 01:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.