David Meyers v. A. Duncan
| DAVID MEYERS |
| A. DUNCAN, Assistant Warden, D. ANDERSON, Warden, ALL ROSP HEARINGS OFFICERS, ALL OF ROSP ICA - MDT MEMBERS, ALL ROSP INTEL OFFICERS, LT. BOLLING, LARRY COLLINS, N. HALCOMB, MR. DAY-DAYE, Unit Manager, MR. GORDON, Unit Manager, MAJOR J. HALL, K. SYKES and COUNSELOR EDWARDS |
| 26-6308 |
| March 11, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 7:26-cv-00126-EKD-CKM. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001975063] [26-6308] RP [Entered: 05/07/2026 02:47 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001975060] [26-6308] RP [Entered: 05/07/2026 02:46 PM]
|
| Filing 4 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to David Meyers re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001952928] [26-6308] RP [Entered: 03/31/2026 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 Notice issued to David Meyers. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001951931] [26-6306, 26-6307, 26-6308, 26-6309] RP [Entered: 03/30/2026 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ David Meyers ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001941711]. Requested document due 03/26/2026 [26-6308] RP [Entered: 03/11/2026 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:26-cv-00126-EKD-CKM. Case manager: RPhillips. [1001941611] [26-6308] RP [Entered: 03/11/2026 11:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
