Londell Alston v. City of Rock Hill
| LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON |
| CITY OF ROCK HILL, SEAN LEARY, COUNTY OF YORK, ROCK HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT JOHN DOE #1, RHPD JOHN DOE #2, ANDREW W. GALLANT, Officer and JAIL DIRECTOR CHIEF JOHN HICKS |
| 26-6362 |
| March 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Londell Lashun Alston for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Londell Lashun Alston. [1001966263] [26-6362] KS [Entered: 04/23/2026 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 04/09/2026. [1001950040] [26-6362] KS [Entered: 03/26/2026 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL NOTICE issued re: unsigned notice of appeal. Originating case number: 0:23-cv-04300-MGL. Mailed to: Londell Lashun Alston. [1001950037] [26-6362] KS [Entered: 03/26/2026 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Londell Lashun Alston. [1001950031] Informal Opening Brief due 04/20/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-6362] KS [Entered: 03/26/2026 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Londell Lashun Alston ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Londell Lashun Alston. [1001950028]. Requested document due 04/10/2026. [26-6362] KS [Entered: 03/26/2026 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 0:23-cv-04300-MGL. Case manager: KStump. [1001950006] [26-6362] KS [Entered: 03/26/2026 10:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.