Mark Roote v. Kershaw County
Plaintiff: MARK ROOTE
Defendant: KERSHAW COUNTY, KERSHAW COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SHERIFF LEE BOAN, individually and in his official capacity as Kershaw County Sheriff and DANNY TEMPLAR
Case Number: 26-6380
Filed: March 30, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 21, 2026 Mark Roote v. Kershaw County

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2026 Filing 18 MOTION by Mark Roote for leave to file Supplemental Brief Section informal opening brief [ # 15 ]. Date and method of service: 05/26/2026 ecf. [1001984060] [26-6380] Mark Roote [Entered: 05/26/2026 12:38 AM]
April 21, 2026 Filing 17 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mark Roote. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001964018] [26-6380]--[Edited 04/21/2026 by RP - filer updated] Mark Roote [Entered: 04/21/2026 11:05 AM]
April 20, 2026 Filing 16 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Mark Roote re: filing of disclosure form. Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. [1001963366] [26-6380] RP [Entered: 04/20/2026 02:44 PM]
April 20, 2026 Filing 15 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Mark Roote. [1001963359] [26-6380] Mark Roote [Entered: 04/20/2026 02:39 PM]
April 6, 2026 Filing 14 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Mark Roote re: failure to satisfy fee requirements. Fee due 04/21/2026. [1001955905] [26-6380] RP [Entered: 04/06/2026 04:12 PM]
April 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER filed denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [11]. Copies to all parties. [1001955899] [26-6380] RP [Entered: 04/06/2026 04:10 PM]
April 6, 2026 Filing 12 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001955749]. Due: 04/20/2026. [26-6380] RP [Entered: 04/06/2026 02:20 PM]
April 6, 2026 Filing 11 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Lee Boan, Kershaw County, Kershaw County Sheriff's Office, Danny Templar and Mark Roote. [1001955742] [26-6380] Mark Roote [Entered: 04/06/2026 02:14 PM]
April 6, 2026 Filing 10 STATUS OF COUNSEL FORM-WAIVER by Mark Roote. [1001955741] [26-6380]--[Edited 04/06/2026 by RP - docket text updated] Mark Roote [Entered: 04/06/2026 02:11 PM]
April 3, 2026 Filing 9 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001955144] Informal Opening Brief due 04/27/2026 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-6380] AW [Entered: 04/03/2026 04:14 PM]
April 3, 2026 Filing 8 MOTION by Mark Roote re: ADA accommodations. [1001955141] [26-6380] AW [Entered: 04/03/2026 04:12 PM]
April 3, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION by Mark Roote to amend/correct nature or suit. [1001955137] [26-6380] AW [Entered: 04/03/2026 04:11 PM]
April 3, 2026 Filing 6 Attorney Joshua Snow Kendrick for Mark Roote in 26-6380, Christopher Shannon Leonard for Mark Roote in 26-6380 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001955132] [26-6380] AW [Entered: 04/03/2026 04:09 PM]
April 3, 2026 Filing 5 STATUS OF COUNSEL FORM-WAIVER by Mark Roote. [1001955131] [26-6380] AW [Entered: 04/03/2026 04:09 PM]
March 30, 2026 Filing 4 FEE NOTICE issued to Mark Roote - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 04/29/2026 Originating case number: 3:25-cv-01392-SAL. Mailed to: Mark Roote and Christopher Leonard. [1001951775] [26-6380] RP [Entered: 03/30/2026 11:37 AM]
March 30, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE ISSUED to Mark Roote re: status of counsel. Mailed to: Mark Roote and Christopher Leonard. [1001951766] Status of Counsel due 04/09/2026. [26-6380] RP [Entered: 03/30/2026 11:35 AM]
March 30, 2026 Filing 2 IFP APPLICATION transferred from district court (court access only). [1001951759] [26-6380] RP [Entered: 03/30/2026 11:34 AM]
March 30, 2026 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:25-cv-01392-SAL. Case manager: RPhillips. [1001951756] [26-6380] RP [Entered: 03/30/2026 11:33 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mark Roote v. Kershaw County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARK ROOTE
Represented By: Mark Roote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KERSHAW COUNTY
Represented By: Damon C. Wlodarczyk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KERSHAW COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Represented By: Damon C. Wlodarczyk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHERIFF LEE BOAN, individually and in his official capacity as Kershaw County Sheriff
Represented By: Damon C. Wlodarczyk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANNY TEMPLAR
Represented By: Damon C. Wlodarczyk Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?