Timothy Jones v. Rajaguru
| TIMOTHY ANTONIO JONES |
| DEPUTY RAJAGURU, DEPUTY TYLER and DEPUTY GENOVA |
| 26-6436 |
| April 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Timothy Antonio Jones re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Timothy Antonio Jones. [1001984801] [26-6436] SB [Entered: 05/26/2026 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 5 Returned mail received from Timothy Antonio Jones re [ # 2 ] plra Notice , [ # 3 ] briefing order. What action was taken to correct address and re-serve document? None- no forwarding address [1001972852] [26-6436] SB [Entered: 05/04/2026 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001960776]. Due: 04/29/2026. [26-6436] SB [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Timothy Antonio Jones. [1001960767] Informal Opening Brief due 05/11/2026 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-6436] SB [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Timothy Antonio Jones ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Timothy Antonio Jones. [1001960754]. Requested document due 04/30/2026 [26-6436] SB [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:25-cv-00898-MHL-MRC. Case manager: SBatchleor. [1001959885] [26-6436] SB [Entered: 04/13/2026 04:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
