Jabar Mabry v. Officer Hopkins
| JABAR MABRY |
| OFFICER HOPKINS and LIEUTENANT JONES, OPR |
| 26-6457 |
| April 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Jabar Mabry re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Jabar Mabry. [1001986165] [26-6457] KH [Entered: 05/27/2026 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Officer Hopkins. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001965376] [26-6457] Amy Leone [Entered: 04/22/2026 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Amy L Leone for Officer Hopkins. [1001965371] [26-6457] Amy Leone [Entered: 04/22/2026 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Jabar Mabry. [1001961951] Informal Opening Brief due 05/11/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-6457] KH [Entered: 04/16/2026 12:50 PM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Jabar Mabry ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Jabar Mabry. [1001961948]. Requested document due 05/01/2026. [26-6457] KH [Entered: 04/16/2026 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001961929]. Due: 04/30/2026. [26-6457] KH [Entered: 04/16/2026 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:24-cv-00396-MRC. Case manager: KHancock. [1001961908] [26-6457] KH [Entered: 04/16/2026 12:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
