Jason Boyle v. Oconee County
| JASON MICHAEL BOYLE |
| OCONEE COUNTY, OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, OCONEE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, SHERIFF MIKE CRENSHAW, in his individual capacity, CAPTAIN JEREMY CHAPMAN, in his individual capacity, DEPUTY JIMMY DIXON, in his individual capacity, OFFICER HONEA, in his individual capacity, DEPUTY PRESTON KIRBY, in his individual capacity and JOHN & JANE DOES 1 - 10 |
| 26-6488 |
| April 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Jason Michael Boyle and Jeremy Chapman, Mike Crenshaw, Jimmy Dixon, John & Jane Does 1 - 10, Officer Honea, Preston Kirby, Oconee County, Oconee County Detention Center and Oconee County Sheriff's Office. [1001980689] [26-6488] Jason Boyle [Entered: 05/18/2026 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Jason Michael Boyle. [1001977194] [26-6488] Jason Boyle [Entered: 05/12/2026 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001966705]. Due: 05/08/2026. [26-6488] MP [Entered: 04/24/2026 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Jason Michael Boyle. [1001966697] Informal Opening Brief due 05/18/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-6488] MP [Entered: 04/24/2026 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:25-cv-10398-JDA-WSB. Case manager: MPowers. [1001966598] [26-6488] MP [Entered: 04/24/2026 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
