Keith Sumblin v. Michael Moore
| KEITH SUMBLIN |
| MICHAEL MOORE, Sheriff for Portsmouth Sheriff's Office and Staff Operate under the direction of the Portsmouth Sheriff's Office, in individual capacity, R. T. BROWN, Badge # 647, in individual capacity, J. JAMES, Badge # 6364, in individual capacity, D. EDWARD, Badge # 6060, in individual capacity, WHITE, Badge # 6314, in individual capacity, COURTNEY NICOLAS, in individual capacity, MR. WHITMOORE, in individual capacity, DIANE GRIFFIN, in individual capacity, SOLOMON HUNTER ASHBY, JR., LAUREL UHLAR, n individual capacity and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Division of Risk Management, as surety for the Defendants |
| 26-6676 |
| June 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001994939]. Due: 06/24/2026. [26-6676] RS [Entered: 06/10/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. [1001994936] Informal Opening Brief due 07/07/2026 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-6676] RS [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Keith Sumblin ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days.. [1001994931]. Requested document due 06/25/2026 [26-6676] RS [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:25-cv-00457-EWH-RJK. Case manager: RSewell. [1001994916] [26-6676] RS [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
