Maykel Nunez v. Markwayne Mullin
| MAYKEL LIMA NUNEZ |
| MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Secretary of Homeland Security, DAVID J. VENTURELLA, Acting Director, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, ROBERT GUADIAN, Washington Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General of the United States and JEFFREY CRAWFORD, Warden of Farmville Detention Center |
| 26-6847 |
| August 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED to Maykel Lima Nunez re: status of counsel. [1002030034] Status of Counsel due 08/17/2026. [26-6847] CH [Entered: 08/06/2026 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1002030022] Opening Brief and Appendix due 09/15/2026. Response Brief due 10/15/2026. [26-6847] CH [Entered: 08/06/2026 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1002030003-2 ] habeas immigration case. Originating case number: 1:26-cv-01216-LMB-WEF. [1002030015] [26-6847] CH [Entered: 08/06/2026 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE ISSUED re: case caption. [1002030007] [26-6847] CH [Entered: 08/06/2026 11:04 AM] |
| Habeas corpus immigration case docketed. Originating case number: 1:26-cv-01216-LMB-WEF. Date notice of appeal filed: 08/03/2026. Case manager: CHalupa. [1002030003] [26-6847] CH [Entered: 08/06/2026 11:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
