Tarun Vyas v. Chad Morris
| TARUN KUMAR VYAS |
| CHAD MORRIS, Special Agent, V.S.P., ALYCIA ELDRIDGE, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney, HEAD OF THE INTERNAL CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN (I.C.A.C) DIVISION OF VSP, HEAD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, MARSHA LEIGH GARST, Commonwealth's Attorney, CITY OF HARRISONBURG, COUNTY OF ROCKINGHAM, RANDALL LIFE, Detective, Harrisonburg Police Department, KELLY WARNER, a/k/a Kelley Warner, Chief of HPD, VICTORIA JENSEN, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney, WELTHEREU, Detective, Harrisonburg Police Department, SEAN D. RANKIN, Magistrate, BRYAN HUTCHESON, Sheriff and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA |
| 26-6983 |
| September 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1002056761]. Due: 10/01/2026. [26-6983] RP [Entered: 09/17/2026 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Tarun Kumar Vyas.. [1002056734] Informal Opening Brief due 10/13/2026 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-6983] RP [Entered: 09/17/2026 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Tarun Kumar Vyas ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Tarun Kumar Vyas. [1002056728]. Requested document due 10/02/2026 [26-6983] RP [Entered: 09/17/2026 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:23-cv-00216-EKD-JCH. Case manager: RPhillips. [1002056722] [26-6983] RP [Entered: 09/17/2026 01:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.