Andrew Battle v. M.A. Mathney
| ANDREW V. BATTLE |
| J. FRANALIN, Sgt. Deputy 16-002, J. FANELLI, Deputy, 23-020 Badge, MORALES, Deputy, 24-001 Badge, Intel Deputy, GARCIA, Deputy, 22-031 Badge, Intel Deputy, J.D. SWENK, 25-004 Badge, A. JACHIMAK, 17-059 Badge, Deputy, J. PHELPS, Sgt. Deputy 12-014, SULLIVAN, Deputy, Delta Team Deputy, M.D. FARJARDO, 13-033 Badge, Deputy, M.L. RUPERT, Sgt. 13-049 Badge # and M.A. MATHNEY, Sgt. 14-020 Badge # |
| 26-7202 |
| November 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1002093603]. Due: 11/24/2026. [26-7202] MP [Entered: 11/10/2026 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Andrew V. Battle. [1002093599] Informal Opening Brief due 12/04/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-7202] MP [Entered: 11/10/2026 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Andrew V. Battle ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Andrew V. Battle. [1002093591]. Requested document due 11/25/2026. [26-7202] MP [Entered: 11/10/2026 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE ISSUED re: Pro Se electronic notification consent. Mailed to: Andrew V. Battle. [1002093589] [26-7202] MP [Entered: 11/10/2026 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:26-cv-03097-LMB-IDD. Case manager: MPowers. [1002093585] [26-7202] MP [Entered: 11/10/2026 03:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
