City of Austin v. Ken Paxton, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITY OF AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellant: KEN PAXTON, Attorney General of the State of Texas and TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION
Case Number: 18-50646
Filed: August 9, 2018
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 4, 2019 Summary City of Austin v. Paxton

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: City of Austin v. Ken Paxton, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: CITY OF AUSTIN
Represented By: Hannah Vahl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: KEN PAXTON, Attorney General of the State of Texas
Represented By: Adam Nicholas Bitter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION
Represented By: Adam Nicholas Bitter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?