Cases 1 - 10 of 406
Lewis v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
State of Texas, Williamson County, Texas, City of Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Lee et al v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Flynn Lee, Rochion Gregg and Andrea Jordan
Defendant:
City of Austin and Carol Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Walker v. Travis County, Texas
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Jason Walker
Defendant:
Travis County, Texas, Amber Jones, Vivian Pan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gosselin v. City of Austin
as 1:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Samantha Gosselin
Defendant:
City of Austin d/b/a Austin Energy and City of Austin doing business as Austin Energy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Virden v. City of Austin
as 23-50697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jennifer Virden and William H. Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Austin, Texas
Garcia v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2023cv01140
Plaintiff:
Louis Garcia
Defendant:
City of Austin and Travis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barnett v. Chacon
as 23-50640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph Chacon, Chief of Police, Delia Garza, County Prosecutor, Andy Brown, Executive Chief Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
