Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gonzales v. City of Austin
as 26-50605
Plaintiff:
Alex Gonzales, Sr. and Elizabeth Herrera
Defendant:
City of Austin and Gabriel Gutierrez
Intervenor:
Minor Child Z.A.G. and Hendler Flores Law, P.L.L.C.
Ruiz v. City of Austin
as 26-50590
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ruiz
Defendant:
City of Austin, Austin Police Department, Jon Francis Riordan, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
2018 00-01501 East Austin, LP et al v. City of Austin, Texas
as 1:2026cv01870
Plaintiff:
2018 1500-1501 East Austin, LP, 2013 Austin East 12th Street, LP, 1522 and 1600 East 12th Street, LP and others
Defendant:
City of Austin, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guevara Navarro v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2026cv01793
Plaintiff:
Yessica Guevara Navarro
Defendant:
City Of Austin and James McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-50551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thompson v. City of Austin
as 26-50539
Plaintiff:
Mark Thompson
Defendant:
City of Austin, Austin Police Department and HEB
Rose v. Easley et al
as 1:2026cv01660
Plaintiff:
Blaire Rose
Defendant:
Larry Easley, Michelle Warren, Aaron Cornish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. The City of Austin et al
as 1:2026cv01362
Petitioner:
Delarick Evans
Respondent:
The City of Austin, Homeless Strategy Officer, David Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
