Daniel Robinson v. James LeBlanc, et al
CRAIG WHITE, JAMES LEBLANC, PREETY SINGH, TODD BARRERE, TIM HOOPER, ERIC HINYARD and DEMETRIUS BUTLER |
DANIEL LEE ROBINSON |
19-30958 |
November 20, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 01/03/2020 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Daniel Lee Robinson because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. Fee or motion for IFP in 5CCA due on 02/05/2020 for Appellant Daniel Lee Robinson. [19-30958] (RLL) [Entered: 01/06/2020 11:14 AM] |
DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Daniel Lee Robinson. Fee deadline satisfied. [19-30958] (AGL) [Entered: 01/02/2020 12:58 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9197476-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-30958] (CB) [Entered: 11/25/2019 02:54 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9197464-2] Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 01/21/2020 for Appellant Daniel Lee Robinson [19-30958] (CB) [Entered: 11/25/2019 02:51 PM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9196836-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Lee Robinson. [9196836-1] [19-30958] (Notice of Appeal filed on 11/20/19) (MCS) [Entered: 11/25/2019 09:33 AM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the brief on behalf of Petitioner received from Appellant Mr. Daniel Lee Robinson because document is premature. [19-30958] (RLL) [Entered: 11/22/2019 03:22 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Lee Robinson. [19-30958] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/20/2019 01:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.