Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-30316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guidry v. Hooper et al
as 3:2026cv00502
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lamond Guidry
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, William Rosso, Tyrenni T. Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muqtadir-Asadullah v. LeBlanc et al
as 7:2026cv00270
Plaintiff:
Sulaimaan Muqtadir-Asadullah and Solomon Jordan Lewis
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Burl Cain, Darryl Vannoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Woodberry v. Jarrell et al
as 3:2025cv00883
Plaintiff:
Derrick Woodberry
Defendant:
Walter Jarrell, Seth Smith, Gary Westcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reel v. Hooper
as 25-30521
Plaintiff:
Ronald Reel
Defendant:
Ashli Oliveaux, Deputy Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Tim Hooper
Voice of the Experienced v. LeBlanc
as 25-30478
Plaintiff:
Voice of the Experienced, a membership organization on behalf of itself and its members, Myron Smith, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Damaris Jackson, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections
Stafford v. Hooper
as 1:2025cv01101
Plaintiff:
Derrick Stafford
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Elizabeth Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stafford v. Hooper
as 3:2025cv00649
Respondent:
Elizabeth Murrill and Tim Hooper
Petitioner:
Derrick Stafford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lapell v. McPhillip et al
as 3:2025cv00526
Plaintiff:
David Lapell
Defendant:
Unknown McPhillip, Unknown Lewis, Unknown Mattews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
