Rocky Annis v. State of Texas, et al
| RICK YEGLICK, OFFICER O'NIEL, PEARLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEIGHBORS EMERGENCY MEDICAL CENTER - PEARLAND, CHARLES KINSEY, PEARLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER RIVERA, PEARLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF TEXAS, MICHAEL MURILLO, Register Nurse and EVERYONE INVOLVED WITH THIS CASE AND CAUSE NUMBER 73315 OUT OF BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS IN THE 23RD DISTRICT COURT FROM THE ARRESTING OFFICER EVEN TO THE JUDGE, EVEN TO COUNSEL FOR DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION |
| ROCKY ANNIS |
| 19-40104 |
| February 7, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Mr. Rocky Annis [ # 8996452-2 ] [19-40104] (DLM) [Entered: 03/01/2019 03:49 PM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Rocky Annis referencing Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Mr. Rocky Annis in 19-40104 [ # 8996452-2 ]. [19-40104] (DLM) [Entered: 03/01/2019 03:49 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Rocky Annis to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [8996452-2]. [19-40104] (DLM) [Entered: 03/01/2019 03:48 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [8983670-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 04/09/2019 for Appellant Rocky Annis [19-40104] (ABT) [Entered: 02/13/2019 03:31 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Rocky Annis [19-40104] (AS) [Entered: 02/07/2019 03:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
