Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bacy v. State of Texas
as 4:2026cv00860
Petitioner:
Samuel Bacy, Jr
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brickman v. Dave
as 26-1903
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA S. BRICKMAN
Defendant:
Dr. MAHESH DAVE, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS and THE STATE OF TEXAS
Hamilton v. Beaumont Plce Dept
as 26-40424
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Hamilton
Defendant:
Beaumont Police Department, FNU Wilkenson, Beaumont Police Officer, Legacy Medical Agency and others
STATE OF TEXAS v. Kennedy
as 7:2026cv00269
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Petitioner:
Tasha Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Chapman v. Sheriff of Lubbock County Texas et al
as 5:2026cv01753
Petitioner:
Charles Brice Chapman
Respondent:
Sheriff of Lubbock County Texas and Attorney General of the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sobin v. The State of Texas
as 6:2026cv00454
Plaintiff:
Dennis Sobin
Defendant:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bernal v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2026cv05519
Plaintiff:
Dennis F. Bernal
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Gregg Abott, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleary v. State of Texas
as 3:2026cv02317
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Cleary
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilson v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2026cv00822
Plaintiff:
Tevin Devon Wilson
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, James Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. The State of Texas
as 4:2026cv00834
Petitioner:
Millard Bell
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
