Orozco v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Rosales and Edmund Orozco
Defendant / Appellee: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 20-20586
Filed: November 12, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jay D. Ellwanger for Appellant David Rosales in 20-20586, Attorney Jay D. Ellwanger for Appellant Edmund Orozco in 20-20586 [20-20586] (ABT) [Entered: 12/31/2020 01:31 PM]
December 29, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jay D. Ellwanger for Mr. Edmund Orozco and Mr. David Rosales for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20586] (Jay D. Ellwanger ) [Entered: 12/29/2020 01:43 PM]
December 15, 2020 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/25/2021 for Appellants Edmund Orozco and David Rosales. [20-20586] (DDL) [Entered: 12/15/2020 01:06 PM]
December 15, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-20586] (DDL) [Entered: 12/15/2020 01:04 PM]
December 7, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-1961. Electronic ROA due on 12/22/2020. [20-20586] (ABT) [Entered: 12/07/2020 10:03 AM]
December 4, 2020 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. Edmund Orozco and Mr. David Rosales advising transcript unnecessary Transcript Order ddl satisfied [20-20586] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. Edmund Orozco and Mr. David Rosales advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 12/04/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Ellwanger; Attorney for Appellee: Wright [20-20586] (Jay D. Ellwanger ) [Entered: 12/04/2020 06:16 PM]
November 19, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9446518-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 12/04/2020 for Appellants Edmund Orozco and David Rosales [20-20586] (JMW) [Entered: 11/19/2020 12:31 PM]
November 12, 2020 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Edmund Orozco and Mr. David Rosales [20-20586] (JMW) [Entered: 11/12/2020 08:00 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Orozco v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: David Rosales
Represented By: Jay D. Ellwanger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Edmund Orozco
Represented By: Jay D. Ellwanger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Ian Andrew Wright
Represented By: Ian Andrew Wright Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?