Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rosales-Alegria v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022cv00515
Petitioner:
Didier David Roasales-Alegria and Didier David Rosales-Alegria
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gonzalez-Hernandez et al v. Estate of Raul David Rosales Acosta
as 3:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Gloria Aracely Aguirre Carrillo, Mayra Fabiola Aguirre Carrillo, Jazmin Barraza and others
Defendant:
Estate of Raul David Rosales Acosta
3Rd Party Defendant:
Lear Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ROSALES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01001
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DAVID ROSALES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Orozco v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 20-20586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Rosales and Edmund Orozco
Defendant / Appellee:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01961
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSALES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34823
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosales v. Capulin et al
as 1:2018cv04797
Plaintiff:
David Rosales
Defendant:
Noe Capulin, 447 Market, Inc. and Kim Boong Yung
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rosales et al v. 447 Market, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04798
Plaintiff:
David Rosales and Noe Capulin
Defendant:
447 Market, Inc. and Kim Boong Yung
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rosales et al v. J.E. Holland Properties, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01450
Plaintiff:
David Rosales and Yamileth Glenda
Defendant:
J.E. Holland Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
David Rosales v. So. Cal Petroleum Transport, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv06789
Defendant:
Does and So. Cal Petroleum Transport, Inc
Plaintiff:
David Rosales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
