Kennemer v. Parker County, Texas
| La Salle Southwest Corrections, Jack County, Texas, Tom Spurlock, Sheriff of Jack County, Parker County, Texas, FNU Coffee, Officer Jane Doe, James Robinson, Larry Fowler, Sheriff of Parker County, John Does 1-7, FNU Garcia, Correctional Officer, Corporal John Doe, Warden John Doe and Jay Eason |
| John David Kennemer |
| 21-10467 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. John David Kennemer. # of Copies Provided: 1 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied [21-10467] (CNF) [Entered: 06/17/2021 11:42 AM] |
| BRIEFING COMPLETE. [21-10467] (CNF) [Entered: 06/17/2021 12:35 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-10467] (MRW) [Entered: 05/21/2021 12:00 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-56. Electronic ROA due on 05/27/2021. [21-10467] (MBC) [Entered: 05/12/2021 02:34 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9572657-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-10467] (MBC) [Entered: 05/12/2021 02:29 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 06/21/2021 for Appellant John David Kennemer. [21-10467] (MBC) [Entered: 05/12/2021 02:30 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. John David Kennemer [21-10467] (RAJ) [Entered: 05/05/2021 03:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
