Richards v. McLane
James Richards |
Marsha McLane, Harris County, Texas, Judge Natalie C. Fleming, Kimm Perez, Tamara Dewbre, Wellpath Recovery Solutions and Christopher Catron |
21-20450 |
August 24, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:18-CV-4109. Electronic ROA due on 11/08/2021. [21-20450] (CAG) [Entered: 10/22/2021 09:35 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 12/01/2021 for Appellant James Richards. [21-20450] (CAG) [Entered: 10/22/2021 09:36 AM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/20/2021 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. James Richards. [21-20450] (CAG) [Entered: 10/21/2021 11:03 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9694124-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-20450] (CAG) [Entered: 10/21/2021 11:02 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Rachel Susan Fraser for Appellee Harris County, Texas in 21-20450 [21-20450] (CAG) [Entered: 09/30/2021 10:45 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Adam Fellows for Appellee Marsha McLane in 21-20450 [21-20450] (NFD) [Entered: 09/27/2021 10:55 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Rachel Susan Fraser for Harris County, Texas for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20450] (Rachel Susan Fraser ) [Entered: 09/27/2021 03:32 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Adam Fellows for Ms. Marsha McLane for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20450] (Adam Fellows ) [Entered: 09/24/2021 03:59 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. James Richards [21-20450] (RLL) [Entered: 08/24/2021 03:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.