Damond v. Gautreaux
| Department of Probation and Parole, Louisiana State Police Department, Thomas Eskola, Will Mitchell, Janice Martin, Division of Probation and Parole, East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office, State of Louisiana and Sid J. Gautreaux, III |
| Glenn Damond |
| 21-30025 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Amber Mandina Babin for party(s) Appellee Louisiana State Police Department Appellee Department of Probation and Parole Appellee Will Mitchell Appellee Janice Martin Appellee Thomas Eskola Appellee Division of Probation and Parole Appellee State of Louisiana, in case 21-30025 [21-30025] (MCS) [Entered: 03/04/2021 08:09 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Glenn Damond. Fee deadline satisfied. [21-30025] (MCS) [Entered: 03/03/2021 11:41 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-30025] (Amber Mandina Babin ) [Entered: 02/26/2021 10:15 AM] |
| UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. Issued PLRA letter due to change of address. [21-30025] (MCS) [Entered: 02/10/2021 08:29 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9486616-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 03/17/2021 for Appellant Glenn Damond. [21-30025] (MCS) [Entered: 01/21/2021 12:06 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Glenn Damond [21-30025] (MCS) [Entered: 01/14/2021 02:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
