Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Damond v. City of Rayville
as 24-30289
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Individually & in his Official Capacity, Tyler Wade, in his Individual Capacity & Official Capacity and others
Damond v. Harrisonburg et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Harrisonburg, Jeremy Wiley, Dale Gary Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. Alexandria et al
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Alexandria, Mark Wood, Colin Radar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. Rayville et al
as 3:2023cv01810
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Tyler Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center, East Baton Rouge, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Janice Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. Gautreaux
as 21-30025
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Probation and Parole, Louisiana State Police Department, Thomas Eskola and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Glenn Damond
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Will Mitchell, Edward Peterson, Correcthealth and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damond v. State of LA
as 20-30684
Defendant / Appellee:
Michelle R. Shelton, City of Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Glenn Damond
Damond v. Martin et al
as 3:2020cv00640
Defendant:
Will Mitchell, Edward Peterson, Correcthealth and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
