Perez v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.
| Osvaldo Perez |
| U.S. Xpress, Incorporated and James Coan |
| 23-50146 |
| February 28, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Motor Vehicle |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0 [23-50146] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Osvaldo Perez. Date of service: 04/24/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Altman; Attorney for Appellant: Scurry [23-50146] (Christopher Michael Scurry ) [Entered: 04/24/2023 03:45 AM] |
| Filing 19 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 05/24/2023 for Appellees James Coan and U.S. Xpress, Incorporated [23-50146] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Osvaldo Perez. Date of service: 04/24/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Altman; Attorney for Appellant: Scurry [23-50146] (Christopher Michael Scurry ) [Entered: 04/24/2023 03:44 AM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jacqueline Altman for Appellee James Coan in 23-50146, Attorney Jacqueline Altman for Appellee U.S. Xpress, Incorporated in 23-50146 [23-50146] (RSM) [Entered: 03/14/2023 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Jacqueline Altman for Mr. James Coan and U.S. Xpress, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50146] (Jacqueline Altman ) [Entered: 03/14/2023 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 15 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/24/2023 for Appellant Osvaldo Perez. [23-50146] (DDL) [Entered: 03/14/2023 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-50146] (DDL) [Entered: 03/14/2023 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Christopher Michael Scurry for Appellant Osvaldo Perez in 23-50146 [23-50146] (NFD) [Entered: 03/07/2023 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:21-CV-432. Electronic ROA due on 03/22/2023. [23-50146] (NFD) [Entered: 03/07/2023 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 10 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [10] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-50146] (NFD) [Entered: 03/07/2023 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT OF ISSUES FILED. [23-50146] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: STATEMENT OF ISSUES FILED by Appellant Osvaldo Perez. Date of Service: 03/03/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Altman; Attorney for Appellant: Scurry [23-50146] (Christopher Michael Scurry ) [Entered: 03/03/2023 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [23-50146] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Osvaldo Perez advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 03/03/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Altman; Attorney for Appellant: Scurry [23-50146] (Christopher Michael Scurry ) [Entered: 03/03/2023 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Christopher Michael Scurry for Osvaldo Perez for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50146] (Christopher Michael Scurry ) [Entered: 03/03/2023 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Osvaldo Perez [23-50146] (AS) [Entered: 02/28/2023 02:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
