Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Padilla v. Osvaldo Perez et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Kailey Padilla
Defendant:
Daniel Osvaldo Perez, Williamson County and Williamson County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.
as 23-50146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Osvaldo Perez
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Xpress, Incorporated and James Coan
Perez v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv00432
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc. and James Coan
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79364
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Osvaldo De Perez-Rodriguez
as 20-50075
Defendant / Appellant:
OSVALDO DE JESUS PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Osvaldo Dejesusperez Rodriguez, also known as Osvaldo Rodriguez, also known as Osvaldo Perez, also known as Osvaldo de Jesus Perez-Rodriguez, also known as Osvaldo de Jesus Rodriguez-Perez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CIEMINSKI et al v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03274
Plaintiff:
ADAM CHAMBERS, JOHN CHUKAYNE, EUGENE GROLLER and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cieminski et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02234
Plaintiff:
Adam Chambers, John Chukayne, Eugene Groller and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Luis Perez v. William Barr
as 19-70844
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
LUIS OSVALDO PEREZ, AKA Luis Osvaldo Perez-Diaz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01313
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc v. Perez-Diaz et al
as 3:2016cv01645
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc
Defendant:
Jorge Osvaldo Perez-Diaz, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Perez-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
