Cat and Dogma v. Target
| Cat and Dogma, LLC |
| Target Corporation |
| 23-50371 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Copyright |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Target Corporation and Appellee Cat and Dogma, LLC [ # 15 ] [23-50371] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/16/2023 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 15 UNOPPOSED JOINT STIPULATION filed by Appellant Target Corporation and Appellee Cat and Dogma, LLC to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [15] Date of Service: 06/14/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Justman; Attorney for Appellee: Sanders. [23-50371] (Jeffrey Justman ) [Entered: 06/14/2023 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 14 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/24/2023 for Appellant Target Corporation. [23-50371] (DDL) [Entered: 06/12/2023 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-50371] (DDL) [Entered: 06/12/2023 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:19-CV-1002. Electronic ROA due on 06/21/2023. [23-50371] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Target Corporation advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [23-50371] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Target Corporation advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 06/06/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Justman; Attorney for Appellee: Sanders; US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Steffen [23-50371] (Jeffrey Justman ) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jeffrey Justman for party(s) Appellant Target Corporation, in case 23-50371 [23-50371] (RAJ) [Entered: 05/22/2023 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-50371] (Jeffrey Justman ) [Entered: 05/18/2023 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 05/31/2023 for Appellant Target Corporation [23-50371] (RAJ) [Entered: 05/16/2023 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Target Corporation [23-50371] (CAS) [Entered: 05/15/2023 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cat and Dogma v. Target | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: Cat and Dogma, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Craig B. Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | James R. Steffen |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Justman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
