Ashley v. Clay County
Plaintiff: Karen Ashley
Defendant: Clay County
Case Number: 24-10005
Filed: January 3, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs (Civil Rights)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2024 Filing 17 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Clay County. Extension Granted to and including 03/21/2024. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 03/21/2024 for Appellant Clay County [24-10005] (CAS) [Entered: 02/14/2024 04:46 PM]
February 14, 2024 Filing 16 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Clay County for filing Appellant's Brief until 03/21/2024 [24-10005] (Thomas Phillip Brandt ) [Entered: 02/14/2024 04:02 PM]
January 18, 2024 Filing 15 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Thomas Phillip Brandt for Appellant Clay County in 24-10005 [24-10005] (JJF) [Entered: 01/18/2024 04:51 PM]
January 18, 2024 Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) John David Husted for party(s) Appellant Clay County, in case 24-10005 [24-10005] (JJF) [Entered: 01/18/2024 04:48 PM]
January 18, 2024 Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Clay County advising transcript unnecessary [24-10005] (CAS) [Entered: 01/18/2024 02:51 PM]
January 18, 2024 Filing 11 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Clay Countyfor the Court to process. Date of service: 01/18/2024 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Brandt; Attorney for Appellee: Doyle. [24-10005] (Thomas Phillip Brandt ) [Entered: 01/18/2024 11:42 AM]
January 18, 2024 Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [24-10005] (John David Husted ) [Entered: 01/18/2024 11:38 AM]
January 18, 2024 Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Thomas Phillip Brandt for Clay County for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [24-10005] (Thomas Phillip Brandt ) [Entered: 01/18/2024 11:35 AM]
January 11, 2024 Filing 8 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/20/2024 for Appellant Clay County. [24-10005] (CAG) [Entered: 01/11/2024 03:49 PM]
January 11, 2024 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [24-10005] (CAG) [Entered: 01/11/2024 03:48 PM]
January 9, 2024 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:23-CV-13. Electronic ROA due on 01/24/2024. [24-10005] (TNM) [Entered: 01/09/2024 09:56 AM]
January 9, 2024 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [24-10005] (TNM) [Entered: 01/09/2024 09:42 AM]
January 3, 2024 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Clay County [24-10005] (TNM) [Entered: 01/03/2024 02:44 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ashley v. Clay County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen Ashley
Represented By: Michael Patrick Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clay County
Represented By: Thomas Phillip Brandt
Represented By: John David Husted
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?