Cases 1 - 10 of 322
Mills v. Clay County Courts et al
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mills
Defendant:
Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills, Wallace v. Clay County Courts et al
as 1:2024cv21635
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mills
Defendant:
Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Goad v. Lyde
as 24-10333
Plaintiff:
Landon Paul Goad and Sarah Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Jeff Lyde, Clay County, Texas and John Does, 1-10
CRAFT v. SWEARINGEN et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CRAFT
Defendant:
BRYSON SWEARINGEN, BRADEN CROWLEY, STAN ROARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Charity Palmer, Ashley Terry, Melissa Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDannell v. City of Gladstone et al
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher M McDannell
Defendant:
City of Gladstone, Jean Moore, Gladstone Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Alan Rhodes
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Henry Lambert, Clay County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. Warden, Clay County Jail
as 3:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
Warden, Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danny Dustin v. Director of Clay County Jail
as 24-10429
Petitioner:
DANNY RICHARD DUSTIN
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF CLAY COUNTY JAIL
Hilt v. Clay County Public Defender's Office et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant:
Clay County Public Defender's Office, Andrew James Ruhlman, Kevin Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
