Allen v. FedEx
| Michael Allen |
| FedEx Ground Package System, Incorporated |
| 24-50344 |
| May 3, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Civil Rights Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 05/21/2024 for Appellant Michael Allen [24-50344] (ABT) [Entered: 05/06/2024 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Allen [24-50344] (RSM) [Entered: 05/03/2024 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Allen v. FedEx | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Allen | |
| Represented By: | John F. Melton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FedEx Ground Package System, Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Joseph William Gagnon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
