Cases 1 - 10 of 871
Wilfong v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01291
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Wilfong
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Berry v. VDOC
as 24-6390
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN BERRY
Respondent:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD
Czajkowski (PS) v. Karn et al
as 1:2024cv01112
Petitioner:
Conrad Czajkowski
Respondent:
Kimberly Karn, Michael Allen, Ainsile Neubert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Liscomb v. Randel et al
as 4:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Liscomb
Defendant:
Kenyen Randel, Antonio D Johnson, Jr, Tod Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Peacock TV LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen
Defendant:
Peacock TV LLC, Regal Cinemas, Inc, Cinemark Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 24-1106
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
JILL BRADY, JENNA KRUSZKA, CATHERINE SHEA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
