Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Liscomb v. Randel et al
as 4:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Liscomb
Defendant:
Kenyen Randel, Antonio D Johnson, Jr, Tod Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivy v. Pope County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Ivy
Defendant:
Pope County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00862
Plaintiff:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Coleman et al
as 2:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Crittenden County Correctional Facility, Teresa Bonner, Kat Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Coleman et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Crittenden County Correctional Facility, Teresa Bonner, Kat Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Torrance Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Coleman et al
as 2:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Crittenden County Correctional Facility, Teresa Bonner, Kat Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Drexal Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cassell et al
as 3:2017cv03039
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Williams, Sr
Defendant:
Cody Cassell, Brian Zini and Arkansas Board of Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cassell et al
as 1:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Williams, Sr
Defendant:
Cody Cassell, Brian Zini and Arkansas Board of Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv00166
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Crittenden County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2015cv00150
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brown
Defendant:
Crittenden County, Arkansas, Crittenden County Detention Center, Michael Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
