Sampson v. USA
| Michael Sampson |
| United States of America, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Energy, United States Navy, Mark Sokol, Katherine K. Vidal, Darnell Jayne, John Livingston, Tim Caruthers, Google Plus, LinkedIn, Wikipedia and Twitter, Incorporated |
| 25-40773 |
| November 26, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the voluntary statement received from Appellant Mr. Michael Sampson because this case was dismissed for failure to pay the fee on February 4, 2026. [25-40773] (CMC) [Entered: 03/03/2026 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 7 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [7] [25-40773] (CMC) [Entered: 02/04/2026 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 01/28/2026 for Appellant Michael Sampson [25-40773] (CMC) [Entered: 01/19/2026 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 01/13/2026 for Appellant Michael Sampson [25-40773] (JAK) [Entered: 12/29/2025 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Sampson [25-40773] (IAC) [Entered: 11/26/2025 01:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
