Contreras v. APD
Plaintiff: Jose David Contreras, Jr.
Defendant: APD, Lelan Larroque, AP 8459, APD Officer and Eric Soto, DPS Trooper
Case Number: 25-50271
Filed: April 8, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2025 Filing 31 CLERK ORDER denying Motion to reopen case filed by Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. [ # 27 ] [25-50271] (EMF) [Entered: 09/19/2025 04:15 PM]
September 17, 2025 Filing 27 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. to reopen case [27] Default has NOT been remedied. Date of service: 09/17/2025 [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 09/19/2025 09:08 AM]
August 22, 2025 Filing 26 CLERK ORDER denying Motion for reconsideration filed by Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. [ # 22 ] [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 08/22/2025 01:52 PM]
August 21, 2025 Filing 22 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. for reconsideration of the 07/18/2025 clerk order denying Motion to reopen case filed by Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. in 25-50271 [ # 13 ] [22]. Date of service: 08/19/2025 [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 08/21/2025 01:47 PM]
August 21, 2025 Filing 21 COURT ACTION withdrawing Motion for reconsideration filed by Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. [ # 18 ] [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 08/21/2025 01:42 PM]
August 8, 2025 Filing 19 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the copy of document filed as a motion to reopen and denied received from Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. because a signed copy of the motion to reconsider the denial is due with the appellant brief attached. [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 08/11/2025 11:18 AM]
July 24, 2025 Filing 18 WITHDRAWN--MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. for reconsideration of the 07/18/2025 clerk order denying Motion to reopen case filed by Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. in 25-50271 [ # 13 ] [18]. Date of service: 07/24/2025 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: requires a signature and default to be remedied Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 08/07/2025 for Appellant Jose David Contreras Jr. [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 07/28/2025 05:39 PM]
July 18, 2025 Filing 17 CLERK ORDER denying Motion to reopen case filed by Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. [ # 13 ] [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 07/18/2025 01:22 PM]
July 16, 2025 Filing 13 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jose David Contreras, Jr. to reopen case [13] Default has NOT been remedied. Date of service: 07/15/2025 [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 07/18/2025 12:08 PM]
July 10, 2025 Filing 11 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to file appellant's brief [11] [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 07/10/2025 06:18 PM]
June 17, 2025 Filing 10 DISMISSAL NOTICE ISSUED for failure to file appellant's brief [10] A/Pet's Brief deadline canceled. DIS-1 Remedy due on 07/02/2025 for Appellant Jose David Contreras Jr.. [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 06/17/2025 09:55 AM]
May 2, 2025 Filing 9 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/11/2025 for Appellant Jose David Contreras Jr.. [25-50271] (DDL) [Entered: 05/02/2025 12:50 PM]
May 2, 2025 Filing 8 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [25-50271] (DDL) [Entered: 05/02/2025 12:50 PM]
April 29, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jose Contreras to appoint counsel [7]. Date of service: 04/29/2025 [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 04/30/2025 11:03 AM]
April 13, 2025 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:25-CV-83. Electronic ROA due on 04/29/2025. [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 04/13/2025 06:02 PM]
April 13, 2025 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [25-50271] (CAS) [Entered: 04/13/2025 05:51 PM]
April 8, 2025 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jose Contreras [25-50271] (LEF) [Entered: 04/08/2025 09:07 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Contreras v. APD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lelan Larroque
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AP 8459, APD Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Soto, DPS Trooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose David Contreras, Jr.
Represented By: Jose David Contreras Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?