Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Baca v. Caro et al
as 1:2026cv02896
Petitioner:
Gabriel Baca
Defendant:
Carlos Caro, John/Jane Doe APD Officer 1-5, City of Albuquerque and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rider v. APD Officer Cruz et al
as 1:2026cv02072
Plaintiff:
Avery Rider
Defendant:
APD Officer Cruz, APD Cold Case Detective Salinas, APD Officer Simonton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. APD et al
as 1:2026cv00941
Plaintiff:
Justyna Wade
Defendant:
APD, The Church of Scientology and Iluminata Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jain et al v. Citibank, N.A.
as 2:2026cv02052
Plaintiff:
Sachin Jain, Shalini Jain, Precision Networking LLC and others
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Darden v. LaFrance, et al.
as 26-1606
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN THOMAS HOUSE DARDEN
Defendant:
SUZANNE LAFRANCE, Mayor, in her individual and official capacities, CHRISTOPHER CONSTANT, Assembly chair, in his individual and official capacities, EVA GARDNER, in her individual and official capacities and others
Catt et al v. AGI Trucking Inc et al
as 3:2026cv00351
Plaintiff:
Larry Catt
Defendant:
AGI Trucking Inc, APD Logistics Inc and Aureluis Johnathan Williams
Pretrial Service:
Karen Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Nicholas J. Viggiano, Jr. v. Anaheim Police Dept. et al
as 2:2026cv01542
Petitioner:
Nicholas J. Viggiano, Jr.
Respondent:
Anaheim Police Dept, Anaheim Police Dept I.A., Anaheim City Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dangim v. Trump et al
as 1:2026cv00107
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Dangim
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump and APD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
