Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hart v. MDC
as 1:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
MDC, APD, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson Smith v. Sheriff, DeKalb County Georgia, et al
as 23-11474
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHENSON LAMAR SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
SHERIFF, DEKALB COUNTY GEORGIA, APD OFFICER A. MORELL, Zone #6, APD OFFICER MURRAY, #2604 and others
Footman v. Judicial Officer = APD et al
as 1:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Footman
Defendant:
Judicial Officer = APD, 911 Dispatcher = APD, Judge Elizabeth Emmanule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dangim v. APD et al
as 1:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Dangim
Defendant:
APD, DA, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dangim v. APD et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Dangim
Defendant:
APD, Isleta Casino and CDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, APD Officer A. Morell, APD Officer Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of Texas Officials et al
as 1:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Roger Alan Smith
Defendant:
State of Texas Officials, Taylor Co. Municipality, Jones Co. Municipality and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stansberry v. Entry GCCC Disciplinary Committee et al
as 3:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Entry GCCC Disciplinary Committee, Supts Ansal, Houser and others
Spencer Nimham-El-Dey v. DOC et al
as 1:2022cv04506
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Spencer Nimham-El-Dey
Defendant:
DOC, DOC Commissioner and APDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. BCSO et al
as 1:2021cv01109
Plaintiff:
Benny P Romero
Defendant:
BCSO, APD and SWAT Teams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
