Sarah Cordle v. Enovis Corporation, et al
| SARAH CORDLE, by and through her Next Friend Dorothy Cordle |
| COLFAX CORPORATION, DJO GLOBAL, INC., DJO, LLC and ENOVIS CORPORATION |
| 24-5958 |
| October 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| P.I.: Product Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 01/16/2025. appellee brief now due 02/18/2025. (LMR) [Entered: 12/03/2024 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 14 VIDEO CONFERENCE: The Mediation conference has been rescheduled for 12/03/2024 at 9:30 AM (ET) with Kathryn Wollenburg. [Please open notice for important details.] (LMR) [Entered: 11/26/2024 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Melissa Gail Foster Bird and Shaina Massie ; Colfax Corporation makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? Colfax Corporation is not a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation. On or about April 4, 2022, and prior to the alleged incident at issue in this appeal, Colfax Corporation changed its name to Enovis Corporation, and no entity called Colfax Corporation that has any relationship with Enovis Corporation or its affiliates now exists. 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? There is no publicly owned corporation, not a party to this appeal, that has a financial interest in the outcome. Certificate of Service: 11/07/2024. [24-5958] (MGF) [Entered: 11/07/2024 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 12 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 12/17/2024;. appellee brief due 01/16/2025; (RLB) [Entered: 11/07/2024 08:02 AM] |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Melissa Gail Foster Bird and Shaina Massie ; DJO, LLC makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? DJO, LLC is wholly owned by DJO Finance, LLC. DJO Finance, LLC is a holding company, and its ultimate parent company is Enovis Corporation, a publicly owned company and a party to this appeal. 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? There is no publicly owned corporation, not a party to this appeal, that has a financial interest in the outcome. Certificate of Service: 11/06/2024. [24-5958] (MGF) [Entered: 11/06/2024 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Melissa Gail Foster Bird and Shaina Massie ; DJO Global, Inc. makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? DJO Global, Inc. is wholly owned by Motion Parent, Inc. Motion Parent, Inc. is a holding company wholly owned by Enovis Corporation, a publicly owned company and a party to this appeal. 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? There is no publicly owned corporation, not a party to this appeal, that has a financial interest in the outcome. Certificate of Service: 11/06/2024. [24-5958] (MGF) [Entered: 11/06/2024 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Melissa Gail Foster Bird and Shaina Massie ; Enovis Corporation makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? Enovis Corporation is not a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation. On or about April 4, 2022, and prior to the alleged incident at issue in this appeal, Colfax Corporation changed its name to Enovis Corporation, and no entity called Colfax Corporation that has any relationship with Enovis Corporation or its affiliates now exists. 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? There is no publicly owned corporation, not a party to this appeal, that has a financial interest in the outcome. Certificate of Service: 11/06/2024. [24-5958] (MGF) [Entered: 11/06/2024 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Enovis Corporation, Colfax Corporation, DJO Global, Inc. and DJO, LLC by Shaina Massie. Certificate of Service: 11/06/2024. [24-5958] (SDM) [Entered: 11/06/2024 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Enovis Corporation, Colfax Corporation, DJO Global, Inc. and DJO, LLC by Melissa Gail Foster Bird. Certificate of Service: 11/06/2024. [24-5958] (MGF) [Entered: 11/06/2024 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Robert W. Miller ; Sarah Cordle makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 11/06/2024. [24-5958] (RWM) [Entered: 11/06/2024 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Robert W. Miller for Appellant Sarah Cordle. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Parties Against Whom this Appeal is Being Taken: Colfax Corporation, DJO Global, Inc., DJO, LLC and Enovis Corporation ; Issues: 1. The Honorable Trial Court erred in overruling the plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint. 2. The Honorable Trial Court erred in ruling and finding that the plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint was futile. 3. The Honorable Trial Court erred in finding and ruling that the plaintiff's complaint had failed to sufficiently set forth specific factual allegations to state a cause of action. 4. The Honorable Trial Court erred in failing to require the Defendants to first address any perceived defects in the factual information set forth in the Plaintiff's complaint, pursuant to a motion for a more definite statement of facts. 5. The Honorable Trial Court erred in finding that the Plaintiffs, had not established a sufficient basis to acquire subject matter jurisdiction over any one of the defendants; or in the alternative, to at least conduct an evidentiary hearing on said iss . Certificate of Service: 11/16/2024. [24-5958] (RWM) [Entered: 11/06/2024 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Sarah Cordle by Robert W. Miller. Certificate of Service: 11/06/2024. [24-5958] (RWM) [Entered: 11/06/2024 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. VIDEO CONFERENCE: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 11/21/2024 at 9:30 AM (ET) with Kathryn Wollenburg. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 10/24/2024 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Baker (RLB) [Entered: 10/23/2024 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Sarah Cordle. Transcript needed: n. (RLB) [Entered: 10/23/2024 08:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
